TRANSFUSIONS: IS COVID 19 VACCINATED BLOOD SAFE?
A look at a Japanese report that says we should be concerned.
In this article I wish to bring to your attention the risks that may be associated with blood transfusions due to Covid 19 genetic vaccinations, raised by this recent scientific paper from Japan.
https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202403.0881/v1
I suggest reading it in full as it is only 12 pages (the rest are references) and is quite accessible for a scientific document.
OPINION:
My layman’s interpretation is that the medical world is venturing into unknown territory because of the world wide Covid 19 mRNA vaccination program.
While the authors are not pointing out any definite reactions to the use of vaccinated donated blood they do say “there is an undeniable risk that patients may experience some problems if they receive blood products derived from blood collected in, at least, a brief deferral period after genetic vaccination”.
This scary scenario is tempered by the assertion that while “it is unknown at present whether secondary damage is caused by transfusion of blood products derived from genetic vaccine recipients, it is necessary for medical institutions and administrative organizations to respond and investigate cooperatively, keeping various possibilities in mind, because mechanisms such as the toxicity of the spike protein itself and the effects of LNPs and modified mRNA on the immune response have not been fully elucidated and are still under study”.
In my mind what is being implied here is a possible combination of Lord Denning’s ‘appalling vista’ and lifting the lid on Pandora’s Box.
The authors recommend the disposal of all current blood stocks because spike protein is not removable.
Read that again.
Imagine the reaction if the HSE had to explain that this is for patient safety and in the next breath tell all those who received transfusions since January 2021 that there is ‘nothing to worry about’.
Good luck squaring that circle.
The authors conclude that at the very least, if such blood stocks are offered to patients “then it is essential to add the possibility of contamination with spike protein or other foreign substances to the transfusion consent form and to fully explain this to the patient”.
Again, a nightmare scenario for the HSE and ‘Official Ireland’ who pushed these ‘safe and effective’ experimental products on the Irish people.
How likely do you think it is to happen that the HSE will directly address this problem in the current bizarre scenario where the ‘safe and effective’ mRNA vaccines are still being offered by the HSE on behalf of ‘Official Ireland’ but the uptake of same is being largely ignored by HSE staff and the Irish people.
The uptake was so low they didn’t quote the percentage in the report.
Do HSE staff now know something that we are certain we know and that the vast majority of Irish people believe but find it difficult to say out loud?
REPORT SUMMARY:
This is a brief summary of the document :
The authors wish to “call the attention of medical professionals to the various risks associated with blood transfusions using blood products derived from people who have suffered from long COVID and from genetic vaccine recipients, including those who have received mRNA vaccines”.
They point out that “contrary to initial expectations, it was found that genes and proteins from genetic vaccines persist in the blood of vaccine recipients for prolonged periods of time, and a variety of adverse events resulting from genetic vaccines are now being reported worldwide”.
A previous study reported that “transfusions of plasma and platelet blood components collected before and after COVID-19 vaccination were not associated with increased adverse outcomes in transfusion recipients who did not develop COVID-19. However, they evaluated only plasma and platelet preparations, not red blood cell or whole blood preparations.” Also they point out that “long-term effects remain unclear, as the study only followed up recipients to the point of 30-day readmission rates”.
“It is not actually known how long the vaccine components remain in the body after a person has received a genetic vaccine, but it is expected that they will remain in the body for a longer period than originally thought, in part because spike protein has been detected in the bodies of people several months after vaccination”.
The authors quote various papers on cases of blood abnormalities after Covid 19 mRNA vaccination and conclude that “there is no longer any doubt that the spike protein used as an antigen in genetic vaccines is itself toxic.”
These are the major concerns they have:
IRISH BLOOD TRANSFUSION SERVICE:
The Irish Blood Transfusion Service (IBTS) addresses Covid 19 mRNA vaccination status when deciding whether someone can donate blood as follows:
The 48 hour rule seems to be standard but the “Japanese Red Cross Society has a …deferral period of 6 weeks for AstraZeneca DNA vaccine recipients… the data and rationale for the rule have not been specified.”
I contacted the IBTS for a comment but considering the report is new, one could hardly expect a quick detailed response.
In January 2024, the protocol for dealing with a ‘suspected acute transfusion reaction’ in an Irish hospital was updated to 2023 British standards.
The updated template for dealing with a reaction suggests “Inspect (look for turbidity, clots, discolouration)”
My information is that this wasn’t suggested previously as it was a given with donated blood that this would not be a problem.
Has something changed ?
CONCLUSION:
I will quote the concluding paragraph of the report in full and as always encourage you to do your own research.
“Finally, we would like to state that if we continue to use genetic vaccines such as pseudouridinated mRNAs and mRNA-LNP platforms, there will be further risks like those described in this review.
It should also be stressed that the issues discussed here are matters that pertain to all organ transplants, including bone marrow transplants, and not just blood products.
The impact of these genetic vaccines on blood products and the actual damage caused by them are unknown at present.
Therefore, in order to avoid these risks and prevent further expansion of blood contamination and complication of the situation, we strongly request that the vaccination campaign using genetic vaccines be suspended and that a harm–benefit assessment be carried out as early as possible, as called for by Fraiman et al. and Polykretis et al.
As we have repeatedly stated, the health injuries caused by genetic vaccination are already extremely serious, and it is high time that countries and relevant organizations take concrete steps together to identify the risks and to control and resolve them”.
Is the day coming when anyone getting a transfusion will demand ‘unvaccinated blood’ ?
Unless the blood transfusion service can put these concerns to rest then that is where we are heading.
The more people who ask the sooner we will get answers.
After the last 4 years, the days of giving our medical overlords the benefit of the doubt are over.
If anyone of a medical background reading this wishes to comment, please email me at patricw8@hotmail.com and I would be happy to print it or if you prefer, use the comments section.
Thanks for writing this Patrick. There was a case in New Zealand in 2022, I think, where parents of a very sick baby went to court to make the hospital treating the child (who needed a transfusion ) use unvaccinated blood. I can't remember how it ended but they were having a very hard time. Given the (reported) very high vaccination rates here God only knows how many people could have already received 'vaccinated' blood in transfusions. The whole vaccination rollout was just reckless.
Thanks Tommy.