I am very conscious of the fact that the death and subsequent inquest of Sheena Eivers as concluded this week must still be a very raw wound for her family and friends.
An inquest is an open hearing and as such is reported on by the media in ‘the public interest’.
This commentary is on the basis that I am a member of the general public and as such have an ‘interest’ in the evidence and findings of this inquest as reported by the ‘Irish Mirror’ and wish to offer an opinion on same.
This is not a criticism of the report but an opinion of the evidence and proceedings as reported in the below article.
https://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/family-tragic-dublin-woman-42-32285515
My commentary is based solely on the facts of the inquest as reported.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Sheena Eivers was a 42 year old woman living in Saggart, Co. Dublin who died in July 2021.
Sheena had been on medication for premenstrual dysphoric disorder for over 20 years and was being treated by Clondalkin Mental Health Services (CMHS) for it since 2009.
On the 3rd June 2021 and over the next few weeks, an increase in the dosage of her prescription for lithium was agreed after consultation with staff at CMHS.
On the 28/6/21, Sheena Eivers received the Covid 19 vaccine.
At this time the Covid 19 vaccine was being rolled out at ‘warp speed’ by the government and being trumpeted in the mainstream media as the solution to our ‘pandemic problem’.
I think it is safe to say that it was the FIRST dose of the Covid 19 vaccine that Sheena received on 28/6/21 based on the reporting of the vaccine roll out schedule above.
We are not told what brand of vaccine she received as it is just reported as a comment in the inquest regarding diarrhoea possibly being a side effect.
On 1st July 2021, 3 days after receiving the Covid 19 vaccine, Sheena Eivers died suddenly at her home.
The original inquest at Dublin District Coroners Court had been adjourned for Chief State Pathologist, Professor Linda Mulligan, to review Ms Eiver’s medical records and the three post-mortem reports, each of which had made ‘a different finding about the cause of her death’.
The inquest into Sheena’s death was concluded yesterday.
INQUEST SUMMARY (as per Irish Mirror article):
The family of Sheena Eivers had sought a verdict of medical misadventure, believing that the increase in lithium dosage in the weeks leading up to Sheena’s sudden death may have led to serotonin syndrome, which is potentially fatal.
An error in one of the autopsy reports regarding lithium levels in the body had led to concern and confusion. A French laboratory had incorrectly overestimated the amount of lithium in Ms Eivers’ body “one thousand-fold.”
Evidence was subsequently given that the postmortem report was incorrect due to ‘human error’.
Prof Mulligan after reviewing the autopsy reports concluded that serotonin syndrome was “highly, highly unlikely” to be responsible for Sheena’s death.
INQUEST VERDICT:
Solicitor Niall Tansey, representing the family said that Sheena was ‘considered a healthy person who did not drink or smoke’ and that ‘nobody expected Sheena would die’
So why did Sheena die suddenly ?
The coroner Dr. Clare Keane agreed with the Chief State Pathologist.
She said she had been persuaded by the medical evidence that dismissed linking the death to increased lithium dosage and serotonin syndrome.
The coroner concluded the inquest with a ‘narrative verdict’ saying that Sheena’s sudden death was most likely caused by ‘an irregular heartbeat’ possibly ‘linked to her chronic kidney disease’ with ‘diarrhoea’ as a ‘contributory factor’.
This was in agreement with Professor Mulligan’s evidence.
OPINION:
So, the accepted evidence and conclusion of the inquest into Sheena’s sudden death is that the ‘most likely cause..was an irregular heartbeat’.
Professor Mulligan offered Sheena’s chronic kidney disease as a possible cause of this irregular heartbeat, which I am assuming was not a previous or ongoing medical condition, as surely it would have been mentioned in the inquest.
Professor Mulligan acknowledges a possible link between the Covid 19 vaccine and Sheena’s sudden death three days later saying that the diarrhoea which was ‘a contributory factor’ could be ‘linked to a Covid 19 vaccine she had received the previous day’.
Louise Roseingrave, a former courts reporter at Dublin Coroners Court tweeted this as to the link being made :
Might I go further and suggest that Sheena receiving the Covid 19 vaccine just 3 days before her sudden death might be linked not only to the ‘contributory’ diarrhoea but also possibly to the ‘irregular heartbeat’ that most likely killed her as concluded by Professor Mulligan ?
In evidence, the solicitor (Mr. Tansey) claimed : “The medication must have played a role in her death.” as she had displayed several symptoms of serotonin syndrome’.
Is it possible Mr Tansey was onto something but was pointing the finger at the wrong ‘medication’?
Below are the symptoms of serotonin syndrome and side effects of the Covid 19 vaccine as per HSE.
At least 8 (as ticked) out of 18 listed symptoms of serotonin syndrome are listed as side effects of the Covid 19 vaccines.
Highly coincidental that Sheena had ‘several symptoms’.
It’s now accepted by even the most ardent Covid 19 vax supporters that myocarditis is a side effect with only the frequency of occurrence in doubt.
This major study of 99 million vaccinated individuals released recently shows the following increased risks for various Covid 19 vaccines.
Sheena received a FIRST DOSE of a Covid 19 vaccine on 28/6/21.
According to the above research, depending on it being Pfizer or Moderna brand , she was between 2.78 (278%) times and 3.48 (348%) times more likely to suffer myocarditis than if she hadn’t taken the Covid 19 vaccine.
We aren’t told which vaccine Sheena received but there’s hardly much solace to be found in either Pfizer, Moderna or AstraZeneca based on the above.
The report can be found here:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24001270?via%3Dihub
And what’s one of the symptoms of myocarditis ? ……irregular heartbeat.
This shows a clear possible line between myocarditis, an accepted side effect of the Covid 19 vaccines to Sheena’s symptoms in the days before her death through to the accepted cause of her sudden death; irregular heartbeat.
According to ‘Sage Journals’, the identification of myocarditis as cause of death is problematic and ‘it is important to recognise that myocarditis may be an incidental finding in an autopsy’
Was the possible effect of the Covid 19 vaccine as a cause of the irregular heartbeat and Sheena’s sudden death raised at the inquest or at any point in the investigation ?
According to the ‘Irish Mirror’ report, it seems on the face of it, that in June 2021 someone received an experimental vaccine and dropped dead of ‘an irregular heartbeat’ three days later.
Since Sheena’s death, has no one raised the possible link between these two events despite the fact that Covid 19 vaccine damage is being discussed all over the western world and one of the most talked about adverse reactions is myocarditis ?
It’s hardly believable that these points about the Covid 19 vaccine were discussed and referenced at the inquest but not reported in the article.
If the Covid 19 vaccine was investigated and dismissed as a possible cause of sudden death then this information and evidence should have been put in the public domain by the authorities at the inquest.
If no consideration was given to a further link to the Covid 19 vaccine than the contributory effect of the diarrhoea as acknowledged by the Chief State Pathologist, then it would helpful if this was made clear and explained as to why.
In offering my opinion, I am not questioning the honest intentions of anyone involved in the inquest or of the reporting of same.
It’s important these questions are asked and answered if only to put people’s minds at rest.
Sheena Eivers,
'Ar dheis Dé go raibh a hanam'.
A FEW GENERAL POINTS:
This inquest into the sudden death of a young woman only concluded nearly 3 years after her sad death. With the conclusion of the inquest, it is only now that her death can be registered. This shows why mortality data published by the CSO, while in line with the legal process, is useless in assessing the scale of excess mortality in younger age groups.
The age analysis report of ACTUAL deaths for 2021 was issued on 31/10/23.
It would not have included Sheena’s death.
Over 26 months after Sheena’s death; legal process and the backlog in inquests conspires to muddy the data on young, sudden and excess deaths in Ireland.
When all the evidence is in, we will be told it is ancient history and to move on by ‘Official Ireland’.
On Tuesday, the ‘Irish Mirror’ reported Health Minister Donnelly saying, in response to a question by Roisin Shortall, that a compensation scheme for Covid 19 vaccine damage is in the offing.
We have gone from ‘safe and effective’ Covid 19 vaccines as propagandised by the government and mainstream media to an adverse reaction compensation scheme in the blink of an eye.
Just like that.
No fanfare.
No explanation for the ‘volte face’ needed.
While such a compensation scheme was whispered about previously, the Irish Mirror is the only mainstream media outlet that I can see reporting this now.
Also as I write this, the Irish Mirror seems to be the only mainstream media outlet covering Sheena Eivers inquest conclusion.
Is it possible the ‘Irish Mirror’ has gone ‘rogue’ on other mainstream media to even a small degree ?
First of all condolences to that woman’s family.
Secondly Patrick I wouldn’t say it’s a case of the Mirror going rogue more a case of it being used as a slow release pressure valve for all the people coming to the same conclusion most of the people reading this Substack came to three years ago.
Ditto for the compensation scheme. A tacit agreement by government that ‘yes we fed you poison but not to worry here’s a few quid… now please shut up’.
Meanwhile deaths stack up and birth rates plummet but they’ll doctor the figures and distract us with war (see Europe’s sabre rattling with a Russian ground invasion…).
As for that poor woman I reckon she received AZ or Pfizer… I don’t think Moderna was widely available in the EU at that time. As mentioned in previous replies my aunt in California died of a heart attack hours after her second dose of Moderna. From what I understand more adverse reactions from Moderna have been reported as it has a higher concentration of some ingredients as the others (the name of those ingredients escapes me right now although it could be the concentration of MRNA? I am open to correction on that point).
Thanks again Patrick you’re a shining light in this darkness.
Hello, Patrick, thanks for reporting. If you haven't already seen it, I think you might find this of interest:
TRANSCRIPT - EXCERPT
Jim Ferguson
( at) JimFergusonUK, Jan 19, 2024
https://twitter.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1748312277382471895
Mirror:
https://rumble.com/v4bxk9r-bombshell-study-we-now-have-100-scientific-proof-why-the-jabbed-are-dying-s.html
TRANSCRIPT OF ATTACHED VIDEO - EXCERPT
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: My focus is on making transcripts of censored and shadow-banned videos from 2021-2023, however, I make some exceptions, as in this case, for Dr. Chris Shoemaker. Dr. Chris Shoemaker blogs at https://cshoemakermd.substack.com/
0:30
JIM FERGUSON: There appears to be some information coming to light about hearts working harder after having had two vaccinations. Is that correct?
0:44
DR. CHRIS SHOEMAKER: That's absolutely correct. From a September 2023 study published September, that is, just four months ago, and its lead scientist was Dr. Nakahara from Tokyo, Japan.[1] There were also lead scientists out of, one of South America, one from Houston, Texas and the fourth [inaudible]. So four major study centers participated in this in terms of finding whether asymptomatic people actually, and without myocarditis, was there any evidence that their heart was straining any harder in the vaccinated than the nonvaccinated. And it was found by Dr. Nakakahara, Dr. Nakahara, my apologies, Dr. Nakahara and others, that there was a, not just a 5%, 10%, maybe 12% elevation in heart effort, it's a 47%, virtually 50% increased effort going on in the cardiac cells of vaccinated people compared to unvaccinated. And they found that this elevation persisted for a full 6 months.
The reason we can count on this study as having validity is that they took 5,000 patients worldwide and they meticulously deleted and made sure that if there was any chance of something being driven that was in any way incorrect— Anyway, they brought it down to a 1,000 patients, 700 who were doubly-vaxxed and 300 who were nonvaxxed, and they were meticulous in the study, meticulous in finding whether there was a legitimate elevation or or not.
And it was proven with a P-value, and the scientists out there will know, a P-value[2] of .001 or less. This was meticulous in showing a P-value of certainty that this elevation of 47% cardiac effort was confirmed in the vaxxed. And the unvaxxed had no elevation in cardiac effort for the next 6 months.
We now know the reason that people, whether it be 6 months or 7 months or 12 months after the shot, are dying suddenly. There's a scientific reason now proven by Dr. Nakahara and others and I invite our very careful observers to go to the study which I know you will put on your website.
2:57
JIM FERGUSON: Yeah, absolutely, I will. And I think it's very, very important that people who are listening to this can actually see that that scientific data is, it's factual, it's real, it's not conjecture. We're not making it up as we go along, as it were—
DR. CHRIS SHOEMAKER: No.
JIM FERGUSON: — this is scientific, peer-reviewed with proper data, and that is shocking to think that people's hearts are working 50%, almost 50% harder in the vaccinated as opposed to those who didn't take any of the mRNA covid vaccinations. And, you know, I still, I still, I still hesitate when I call them vaccinations, doctor, because they're not really proper vaccinations, are they? They're gene therapies, aren't they?
DR. CHRIS SHOEMAKER: Gene therapy is the most accurate description. In fact, DARPA[3] and the military, which manufactured this on behalf of Pfizer and Moderna, they specifically in their paperwork do not call it a vaccine. Specifically in their paperwork, call it a military countermeasure, and it's because of that that they didn't have to be as meticulous about how much DNA sludge also got into the jab. And because there's DNA now proven to be in the shots[4]—
And we were advised, the whole world was advised for a whole two years, oh, there can't possibly be DNA, this is an RNA vaccine everybody! Please relax, there can't possibly be anything of a DNA functionality.
Sorry folks. 33% by weight, 33% of by weight of the genetic material which was put into our shoulders is DNA. It's not, shall we say, continuous DNA, it's what's called a plasmid contained elements of DNA. But these plasmid contained elements of DNA mean that the DNA form of it can last for basically a lifetime inside you. For virtually a lifetime, the body can keep responding to the fact that these DNA plasmids have gone to our brain, or gone to our heart or gone to other organs, and that's why the possibility of shedding for a long, long time exists.
4:55
[END OF EXCERPT]
# # #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES
[1] Assessment of Myocardial 18F-FDG Uptake at PET/CT in Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2–vaccinated and Nonvaccinated Patients
Takehiro Nakahara, Yu Iwabuchi, Raita Miyazawa, Kai Tonda, Tohru Shiga, H. William Strauss, Charalambos Antoniades, Jagat Narula, Masahiro Jinzaki
Published Online:Sep 19 2023https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230743
https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/radiol.230743#
[2] For a basic introduction to P-values and significance tests, see:
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/ap-statistics/xfb5d8e68:inference-categorical-proportions/idea-significance-tests/v/p-values-and-significance-tests
[3] DARPA is the US government's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
https://www.darpa.mil
[4] See Dr. Philip Buckhaults testimony
SC Senate Hearing - USC Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults
SC 4 FREEDOM, posted September 13, 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY&t=44s
Transcript: https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/105739.html
See also:
Dr. Janci Lindsay testimony
SC Senate Hearing - Dr. Janci Lindsay
SC 4 FREEDOM, posted September 16, 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjQQ7kkj3Bs&t=41s
Transcript: https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/106401.html